Frontend Modernization Companies

A neutral market map of companies delivering frontend modernization, plotted by modernization approach and supplier layer. Alphabetical, never ranked or scored.

Updated ·Peter Korpak·Methodology

Compare frontend modernization companies

Filter by what a company migrates from, its modernization approach, supplier type, team size, or region. Listed alphabetically, never ranked, scored, or rated. We currently have no sponsors. Vendor inclusion, recommendations, and highlights are editorial decisions based on documented evidence.

The lists show recorded source and target technologies. They do not prove delivery of every combination. Follow the public evidence links to the checked claims below. “Public sources not reviewed here” means we have not checked those claims; it is not a judgment of the supplier’s performance.

Migrates from:
Approach:
Supplier type:
Team size:
Region:
Frontend Modernization company comparison: recorded source and target coverage, approach, supplier type, team size, region, public evidence kind, and internal relationship records
CompanyRecorded source → target coverageApproachTypeTeam sizeRegionPublic evidence kind
10CloudsFrom: React—Delivery firmMid-sizePolandPublic sources not reviewed here0 internal relationship records
AccentureOracle Forms to React
Rewrite
Delivery firmEnterpriseGlobalPublic sources not reviewed here1 internal relationship record
AvanadeSilverlight to Blazor
RefactorRewrite
Delivery firmEnterpriseSeattle, WAPublic sources not reviewed here1 internal relationship record
BrainhubReact to Next.js
Refactor
Delivery firmMid-sizePoland / USAPublic sources not reviewed here1 internal relationship record
BraintrustCoverage not recorded
RefactorRewrite
Delivery firmMid-sizeGlobalPublic sources not reviewed here1 internal relationship record
CoduranceCoverage not recorded
RefactorRewrite
Delivery firmMid-sizeUK/SpainPublic sources not reviewed here1 internal relationship record
CognizantOracle Forms, Silverlight to React, Blazor
RefactorRewrite
Delivery firmEnterpriseGlobal (US HQ)Public sources not reviewed here2 internal relationship records
DevsDataReact to Next.js
Refactor
Delivery firmMid-sizeUSA / PolandPublic sources not reviewed here1 internal relationship record
EPAM SystemsAngularJS, Oracle Forms, React to React, Next.js
RefactorRewrite
Delivery firmEnterpriseGlobal (USA HQ)Public sources not reviewed here5 internal relationship records
GlobantAngularJS to React
RefactorRewrite
Delivery firmEnterpriseGlobal (Argentina Origins)Public sources not reviewed here1 internal relationship record
Grid DynamicsAngularJS to React
RefactorRewrite
Delivery firmMid-sizeUSA / GlobalPublic sources not reviewed here1 internal relationship record
jscodeshiftCoverage not recorded
Refactor
Product or platform——Public sources not reviewed here0 internal relationship records
Mobilize.NetSilverlight to Blazor
RefactorRewrite
Delivery firmMid-sizeUSA / Costa RicaPublic sources not reviewed here1 internal relationship record
NaturailyReact to Next.js
Refactor
Delivery firmBoutiquePolandPublic sources not reviewed here1 internal relationship record
Next.js CodemodsCoverage not recorded
Refactor
Product or platform——Public sources not reviewed here0 internal relationship records
PageproReact to Next.js
Refactor
Delivery firmBoutiquePoland / UKPublic sources not reviewed here1 internal relationship record
PITSSOracle Forms to React
Rewrite
Delivery firmMid-sizeGermany / USAPublic sources not reviewed here1 internal relationship record
SlalomSilverlight to Blazor
RefactorRewrite
Delivery firmEnterpriseUSA / GlobalPublic sources not reviewed here2 internal relationship records
SoftServeAngularJS, Oracle Forms to React
RefactorRewrite
Delivery firmEnterpriseGlobal (Ukraine Origins)Public sources not reviewed here3 internal relationship records
TestProsCoverage not recorded
RefactorRewrite
Delivery firmMid-sizeUSAPublic sources not reviewed here1 internal relationship record
ThoughtworksAngularJS to React
RefactorRewrite
Delivery firmEnterpriseChicago, IL, USA (global)Public sources not reviewed here3 internal relationship records
ToptalReact to Next.js
RefactorRewrite
Delivery firmEnterpriseGlobalPublic sources not reviewed here2 internal relationship records

The count covers this site’s migration and service links for each company, listed under its entry. It does not count verified case studies or successful projects.

The checked public sources, scoped claims and limits for suppliers across hubs are published as an open vendor evidence dataset with CSV and JSON downloads.

What evidence should a provider show?

Use these guides to decide what to ask providers and what evidence to require before accepting their work. Internal record counts and capability labels do not establish that a provider meets your requirements.

Approach matrix

How Frontend Modernization companies map to modernization approach

Rows group frontend modernization companies by modernization approach, defined in our 7 Rs of application modernization framework; columns separate product vendors from delivery firms.

Refactor is the most common approach here, documented by 19 of 22 companies in frontend modernization. Product vendors and delivery firms both cluster in Refactor.
ApproachProductDelivery firm
Rehostsame code, new infrastructure or emulatorProductNone documentedDelivery firmNone documented
Replatformsame core code, swapped runtime or managed servicesProductNone documentedDelivery firmNone documented
Refactorthe existing code is converted or restructured in placeProductDelivery firm
Rewriterebuilt from scratch on a new architectureProductNone documentedDelivery firm
Replaceswapped for a commercial or SaaS productProductNone documentedDelivery firmNone documented
Retain & optimizekept in place and improvedProductNone documentedDelivery firmNone documented

1 company is not plotted: no documented approach evidence.

What each company delivers in frontend modernization

One entry per company, carrying only attributes we can point at a source for. Where a company has no published evidence for an attribute, nothing is shown rather than a placeholder.

Engagement bands in this domain

Small
$50K–$120K
Mid-market
$150K–$400K
Enterprise
$500K–$2M

Spans are the published pricing tiers on this domain’s service pages (Frontend Modernization Services), cross-checked against the cost benchmarks. A company is placed in a band by its team size — this is a statement about the size of engagement firms of that scale typically deliver here, not a rate card. We publish no per-vendor rates.

  • 10Clouds

    Agency

    Offers embedded React engineers (React, TypeScript, Tailwind CSS) and a React performance-improvement service. Its Next.js use is documented in a new-build AI recruiting case study, not in a migration from React.

    Modernizes from
    React
    Firm profile
    Mid-size · Poland
    Typical engagement band
    Mid-market · $150K–$400K
  • Accenture

    Agency

    Positions Oracle Forms-to-React migrations as an enterprise-wide UI rollout rather than a one-off rewrite, aimed at organizations replacing the old screens across multiple regions or business units at once.

    Rewrite
    Best for
    Global rollout of new UI
    Modernizes
    Oracle Forms to React
    Firm profile
    Enterprise · Global
    Typical engagement band
    Enterprise · $500K–$2M
  • Avanade

    Agency

    Migrates Silverlight applications to Blazor within a broader Microsoft-stack modernization practice, with its documented placement centered on large corporate intranets rather than customer-facing sites.

    RefactorRewrite
    Best for
    Large corporate intranets
    Modernizes
    Silverlight to Blazor
    Firm profile
    Enterprise · Seattle, WA
    Typical engagement band
    Enterprise · $500K–$2M
  • Brainhub

    Agency

    Runs React-to-Next.js migrations focused on performance audits for scale-ups, billed at $50-99/hr from a 500-person Poland-based engineering team under the STX Next group.

    Refactor
    Best for
    Scale-ups needing performance audits
    Modernizes
    React to Next.js
    Firm profile
    Mid-size · Poland / USA
    Typical engagement band
    Mid-market · $150K–$400K
  • A user-owned talent network, not a fixed delivery team, that places individual React, Next.js, and Web3 engineers directly with startups and scale-ups rather than running the migration itself.

    RefactorRewrite
    Best for
    Startups/scaleups
    Firm profile
    Mid-size · Global
    Typical engagement band
    Mid-market · $150K–$400K
    Internal research links
    Frontend Modernization Services
  • Codurance

    Agency

    Leads frontend rewrites through TDD and clean-architecture discipline as a software-craftsmanship consultancy, aimed at teams that make long-term maintainability an explicit delivery requirement.

    RefactorRewrite
    Best for
    High-quality rewrites
    Firm profile
    Mid-size · UK/Spain
    Typical engagement band
    Mid-market · $150K–$400K
    Internal research links
    Frontend Modernization Services
  • Cognizant

    Agency

    Covers both Oracle Forms-to-React and Silverlight-to-Blazor work, positioning the former around digital-experience workflow modernization and the latter around enterprise .NET upgrades rather than a single specialized path.

    RefactorRewrite
    Best for
    Modernizing legacy workflows
    Modernizes
    Oracle Forms, Silverlight to React, Blazor
    Firm profile
    Enterprise · Global (US HQ)
    Typical engagement band
    Enterprise · $500K–$2M
  • DevsData

    Agency

    Staffs React-to-Next.js migrations with senior engineers as an augmentation model, aimed at enterprises that need experienced hands added to an existing team rather than a full outsourced project.

    Refactor
    Best for
    Enterprises needing senior talent augmentation
    Modernizes
    React to Next.js
    Firm profile
    Mid-size · USA / Poland
    Typical engagement band
    Mid-market · $150K–$400K
  • Documented on three separate frontend paths (AngularJS-to-React, Oracle Forms-to-React, and React-to-Next.js), with its Next.js migrations specifically scoped to Fortune 500 codebases rather than smaller projects.

    RefactorRewrite
    Best for
    Complex enterprise apps
    Modernizes
    AngularJS, Oracle Forms, React to React, Next.js
    Firm profile
    Enterprise · Global (USA HQ)
    Typical engagement band
    Enterprise · $500K–$2M
  • Globant

    Agency

    Uses an AI-assisted 'Augmented Coding' process to speed up reading and refactoring legacy AngularJS before rewriting it in React, aimed at consumer-facing products where customer experience is the stated driver.

    RefactorRewrite
    Best for
    Consumer-facing applications
    Modernizes
    AngularJS to React
    Firm profile
    Enterprise · Global (Argentina Origins)
    Typical engagement band
    Enterprise · $500K–$2M
  • Rebuilds monolithic AngularJS commerce frontends into React on a microservices-based architecture, with its documented focus concentrated in retail and CPG platforms rather than general enterprise apps.

    RefactorRewrite
    Best for
    Retail/Commerce platforms
    Modernizes
    AngularJS to React
    Firm profile
    Mid-size · USA / Global
    Typical engagement band
    Mid-market · $150K–$400K
  • jscodeshift

    Platform

    An open-source, Meta-maintained CLI for running AST-based codemods across JavaScript or TypeScript files, supplying the parser and query engine most published React and Next.js upgrade codemods are built on, not a ready-made migration for any one framework.

    Refactor
  • The VBUC and WebMAP tools that automated conversion of legacy Visual Basic 6 and Silverlight codebases now belong to Growth Acceleration Partners and are sold as GAPVelocity.ai. GAPVelocity.ai's Silverlight page describes conversion to Angular and HTML5; a Blazor target is not stated there.

    RefactorRewrite
    Best for
    Rapid, direct conversion
    Modernizes
    Silverlight to Blazor
    Firm profile
    Mid-size · USA / Costa Rica
    Typical engagement band
    Mid-market · $150K–$400K
  • Naturaily

    Agency

    A boutique Jamstack specialist moving React sites to Next.js with an SEO-first lens, aimed at content-heavy publishers chasing Core Web Vitals scores rather than app-like interactivity.

    Refactor
    Best for
    Content-heavy sites needing perfect Core Web Vitals
    Modernizes
    React to Next.js
    Firm profile
    Boutique · Poland
    Typical engagement band
    Small · $50K–$120K
  • Vercel's own @next/codemod CLI, shipped since Next.js 10 and updated through version 16, mechanically rewrites one breaking change at a time, such as next/image imports, so a major upgrade needs several run in sequence and only covers what Vercel has chosen to automate.

    Refactor
  • Pagepro

    Agency

    Migrates Shopify and Magento storefronts onto Next.js with a headless-CMS and commerce integration focus, positioned for e-commerce rebuilds rather than general enterprise React work.

    Refactor
    Best for
    E-commerce migrations (Shopify/Magento to Next.js)
    Modernizes
    React to Next.js
    Firm profile
    Boutique · Poland / UK
    Typical engagement band
    Small · $50K–$120K
  • PITSS

    Agency

    Runs proprietary analysis tools that map Oracle Forms and Reports' PL/SQL dependencies before automating the migration to Java, React, or APEX, aimed at cutting the risk of a manual line-by-line rewrite.

    Rewrite
    Best for
    Deep analysis of PL/SQL dependencies
    Modernizes
    Oracle Forms to React
    Firm profile
    Mid-size · Germany / USA
    Typical engagement band
    Mid-market · $150K–$400K
  • Slalom

    Agency

    Pairs Silverlight-to-Blazor migration with a strategy-first business case, and separately runs Angular-to-React rewrites in TypeScript for large enterprises wanting a UX redesign alongside the technical move.

    RefactorRewrite
    Best for
    Angular → React for large enterprises
    Modernizes
    Silverlight to Blazor
    Firm profile
    Enterprise · USA / Global
    Typical engagement band
    Enterprise · $500K–$2M
  • SoftServe

    Agency

    Fields a Vue.js and Nuxt practice for e-commerce frontend rewrites, alongside AngularJS-to-React and Oracle Forms-to-React work that extends into the backing monolith database rather than stopping at the UI.

    RefactorRewrite
    Best for
    E-commerce frontend rewrites
    Modernizes
    AngularJS, Oracle Forms to React
    Firm profile
    Enterprise · Global (Ukraine Origins)
    Typical engagement band
    Enterprise · $500K–$2M
  • TestPros

    Agency

    An independent QA specialist, not a migration vendor, that builds test-automation suites to validate frontend rewrites in regulated banking and healthcare environments before they ship.

    RefactorRewrite
    Best for
    QA-heavy migrations (banking/healthcare)
    Firm profile
    Mid-size · USA
    Typical engagement band
    Mid-market · $150K–$400K
    Internal research links
    Frontend Modernization Services
  • A 2021 Thoughtworks article documents moving a high-traffic listing page from AngularJS to React gradually with the strangler fig pattern, after a one-year big-bang rewrite of a search page.

    RefactorRewrite
    Best for
    Legacy front ends that cannot pause delivery
    Modernizes
    AngularJS to React
    Firm profile
    Enterprise · Chicago, IL, USA (global)
    Typical engagement band
    Enterprise · $500K–$2M
  • Toptal

    Agency

    Sources one or two freelance React specialists at a time from a screened network accepting roughly 3% of applicants, for teams needing focused senior help rather than a full in-house delivery team.

    RefactorRewrite
    Best for
    Smaller projects, flexible staffing
    Modernizes
    React to Next.js
    Firm profile
    Enterprise · Global
    Typical engagement band
    Enterprise · $500K–$2M

Market map

Companies to evaluate for Frontend Modernization

Scope: published frontend modernization companies with documented category, migration-path, or service evidence in this research domain.

Last evaluated

208

Published modernization companies reviewed

22

Companies shown for frontend modernization

Platforms 2Consultancies & integrators 20

Inclusion criteria: A company must have a published profile and documented category, migration-path, or service evidence in this domain. See the evidence threshold in our research methodology.

How to choose: Start with documented buyer fit (19 profiles) and specialty evidence (22), then narrow by team size (20) and location (20). Open a profile to verify the underlying experience before shortlisting.

This is an alphabetical market map, not an ordinal ranking. Inclusion is based on documented evidence and editorial review.

Frontend modernization is supplied almost entirely by delivery firms rather than products: the codemod tooling is open source and free, so what you are buying is the judgement to use it. Evaluate delivery firms by design-system and component-library depth, state-management experience in the framework you are leaving, accessibility and Core Web Vitals evidence, and whether they can run a strangler-fig migration alongside ongoing feature work rather than pausing it. The tooling layer here — codemod runners and framework-shipped migration CLIs — automates mechanical syntax changes only; untangling business logic fused into the presentation layer stays manual, and that is where the cost sits. Companies appear alphabetically because the right fit depends on your source framework and how much shared design-system groundwork already exists.