About Modernization Intel
Real Costs, Migration Strategies, Failure Analysis
We publish what software modernization vendors hide: real project costs, technical failure modes, and honest migration strategies—backed by analysis of 200+ implementations.
What We Do
Modernization Intel is a research and data platform that analyzes software modernization implementations across 50+ migration paths and technology stacks.
When you search for "COBOL migration cost" or "mainframe to AWS migration," you'll find our cost data, technical guides, and failure analysis—not a contact form.
For each modernization type (legacy systems, mainframe, cloud, data), we publish:
- → Real Cost Data: Project examples with actual ranges ($1.2M-$2.8M for COBOL to Java), not "Contact us for pricing"
- → Technical Failure Analysis: Why 67% fail, with specific pitfalls (COMP-3 decimal precision, VSAM file handling)
- → Migration Strategies: Architecture patterns, incremental approaches, technology trade-offs
- → When NOT to Migrate: Honest guidance on when modernization doesn't make sense
Our Methodology
We analyze publicly available project data from:
- • Published case studies with metrics (codebase size, timeline, cost)
- • Technical documentation and architecture white papers
- • Industry reports and post-mortems
- • Vendor capabilities (specializations, tech stack focus)
We update cost ranges and technical guides quarterly to reflect current market rates and technology changes (e.g., AWS pricing updates, framework deprecations).
Transparency: When we lack data for a specific migration path, we say so. We don't publish theoretical guides—only what we can back with real project examples.
How We Make Money (We're Upfront About It)
Our model: We earn fees from implementation partners when buyers hire them through us. You (the buyer) never pay us.
Why you can trust the data: Partner matching is secondary to publishing research. Our business grows when we become the go-to source for modernization intelligence, not when we make individual matches.
We list all qualified companies we can research—not just those who pay us. If a company doesn't make our recommendations, it's because of their capabilities, not their wallet.
Why this matters: Our audience (CTOs, VP Engineering, Principal Engineers) is ultra-skeptical and will sniff out conflicts of interest. Radical transparency is the only way to build credibility.
What Makes Us Different
vs. Analyst Firms
They publish market trends behind paywalls.
We publish specific costs, architectures, and failure modes—free.
vs. Review Sites
They show 5-star ratings and generic testimonials.
We show technical depth: why Partner A handles COMP-3 decimals correctly and Partner B doesn't.
vs. Vendor Websites
They tell you what they're good at.
We tell you what they're NOT good at—and provide alternatives.
Who This Is For
We write for skeptical technical leaders (VP Engineering, CTO, Principal Engineers, Architects) who:
- • Need to budget and defend modernization projects ($500K-$5M range)
- • Don't trust marketing fluff—they want technical specifics
- • Have been burned by vendors before and assume everyone's hiding something
- • Want data before sales calls, not sales calls before data
If you're Googling "COBOL migration cost" or "mainframe to cloud migration failure rate," you're our audience.
Need Help Finding a Partner?
Already explored our cost data and guides? We can match you with 3-5 vetted implementation partners based on your specific requirements.
What happens: Tell us about your project (5 questions, 2 minutes). We'll send research-backed recommendations with cost data and specializations within 24 hours. No spam, no sales pressure.
Find Partners →Contact
Missing a migration path? Found data we should update? Want to submit a correction?
Email: [email protected]