Top Rated Legacy PHP to Laravel Migration Services
PHP 5.x/7.x to Laravel migration: real costs ($25K-$1M+), 85% success rate with incremental approach, 10 vetted firms from 30+ analyzed. Includes Strangler Fig blueprint.
- Market Rate
- $50k - $500k+
- Typical Timeline
- 6-18 Months
- Complexity
- Low
Updated: February 2026 · Based on 30 verified implementations · Author: Peter Korpak · Independent methodology →
Is Legacy PHP → Laravel the Right Migration?
Migrate if...
- → Application runs procedural PHP 5.x/7.x with no MVC framework
- → Security vulnerabilities from raw PHP SQL queries and missing input validation
- → Need to add authentication, queues, or modern API features efficiently
- → Team wants to adopt modern PHP ecosystem (Composer, PHPUnit, Horizon)
Don't migrate if...
- ✗ Application is running on PHP 8.x already with a modern framework (Symfony, etc.)
- ✗ Team is planning to rewrite in a non-PHP language within 12 months
Alternative Paths
| Alternative | Why Consider It | Best For |
|---|---|---|
| Symfony | Enterprise-grade PHP framework — more opinionated and enterprise-feature-rich than Laravel | Large applications needing strict architecture and enterprise PHP patterns |
| PHP → Node.js | Switch languages if team wants JavaScript full-stack | Teams moving toward unified JS/TS stack for front and back end |
Why Organizations Migrate
- → Laravel Eloquent ORM eliminates manual SQL and reduces SQL injection surface
- → Built-in authentication, queues, and scheduling replaces custom-built equivalents
- → Composer dependency management replaces ad-hoc file includes
- → Larger talent market — Laravel is the most-adopted PHP framework
Market Benchmarks
30 Real Migrations AnalyzedWe analyzed 30 real-world Legacy PHP to Laravel migrations completed between 2022-2024 to provide you with accurate market intelligence.
Most Common Failure Points
Migration Feasibility Assessment
You're an Ideal Candidate If:
- CodeIgniter 2/3 or CakePHP 2 apps
- Custom PHP 5.x apps with security vulnerabilities
- Teams that want to adopt modern PHP practices
Financial Break-Even
Migration typically pays for itself when current maintenance costs exceed $100k/year in maintenance savings/year.
Talent Risk Warning
Low. Laravel developers are abundant, but legacy knowledge is fading.
Critical Risk Factors
According to Modernization Intel's analysis of 30 Legacy PHP to Laravel migrations, 3 risk factors are responsible for the majority of project failures. Each factor below includes the failure pattern and a validated mitigation strategy.
Risk 01 The 'Big Bang' Rewrite Trap
Attempting to rewrite the entire application from scratch usually leads to multi-year delays and feature freeze. The 'Strangler Fig' pattern is the only safe approach.
Risk 02 Session State Incompatibility
Sharing user sessions between the legacy app and the new Laravel app is critical for incremental migration but technically challenging (requires custom session drivers).
Risk 03 Routing Conflicts
Managing two routers (Legacy + Laravel) simultaneously requires precise web server configuration (Nginx/Apache) to delegate requests correctly.
Strategic Roadmap
Discovery & Assessment
4-8 weeks- Code analysis
- Dependency mapping
- Risk assessment
Strategy & Planning
2-4 weeks- Architecture design
- Migration roadmap
- Team formation
Execution & Migration
12-24 months- Iterative migration
- Testing & validation
- DevOps setup
Validation & Cutover
4-8 weeks- UAT
- Performance tuning
- Go-live support
AI Tools That Accelerate This Migration
AI tooling can automate significant portions of the Legacy PHP → Laravel migration. Automation rates reflect code conversion only — business logic review and testing remain manual.
| Tool | Vendor | What It Automates | Automation Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| GitHub Copilot | GitHub / Microsoft | Laravel Eloquent model, controller, and migration generation from existing PHP | 50–65% of boilerplate conversion |
| Amazon Q Developer | AWS | PHP code analysis and Laravel equivalent generation | 35–50% of conversion effort |
Top Legacy PHP to Laravel Migration Companies
The following 10 vendors have been independently assessed by Modernization Intel for Legacy PHP to Laravel migration capability, scored on methodology transparency, delivery track record, pricing clarity, and specialization fit.
Why These Vendors?
Vetted Specialists| Company | Specialty | Best For |
|---|---|---|
Spatie | Domain-Driven Design & Packages | Complex domain logic and high-quality codebases |
Tighten | Enterprise Consulting | Large-scale refactoring and team training |
Vehikl | Mob Programming & TDD | Reskilling your internal team while migrating |
Kirschbaum | Staff Augmentation | US-based teams needing immediate expert help |
Beyond Code | Developer Tooling | Projects requiring custom migration tooling |
10Clouds | Fintech & Banking | Compliance-heavy applications |
Scalo | Team Scaling | Rapidly scaling development capacity |
Belitsoft | Cost-Effective Outsourcing | Budget-conscious migrations |
Iflexion | Complex Integrations | Enterprise apps with many 3rd party integrations |
ScienceSoft | Healthcare & HIPAA | Healthcare applications requiring strict compliance |
Legacy PHP to Laravel TCO Calculator
*Estimates for illustration only. Actual TCO requires detailed assessment.
Technical Deep Dive
Based on 30 enterprise implementations, Legacy PHP to Laravel migration is rated Low complexity with a typical timeline of 6-18 Months. The analysis below documents validated architectural patterns and integration strategies from production deployments.
The Challenge: “It Works, But We’re Scared to Touch It”
Your legacy PHP application (likely built on CodeIgniter, CakePHP, Symfony 1.x, or a Custom MVC) is the backbone of your business. But it’s brittle. Developers are afraid to deploy. Security patches for PHP 5.6 or 7.x are long gone.
Migrating to Laravel is the industry standard for modernizing PHP. It offers a robust ecosystem, strict security defaults, and a developer experience that helps you hire top talent. But getting there without breaking the business is the hard part.
Technical Deep Dive
1. The “Strangler Fig” Pattern
The only safe way to migrate a live application is incrementally. We use the Strangler Fig Pattern:
- Install Laravel alongside your legacy app.
- Configure Nginx/Apache to route specific URLs to Laravel, while defaulting everything else to the legacy app.
- Migrate one module (e.g., User Profile) to Laravel.
- Switch the route to point to Laravel.
- Repeat until the legacy app is gone.
2. The Session Problem
The biggest technical hurdle is sharing state. When a user logs into the Legacy app, they must be logged into Laravel, and vice versa.
- Solution: Use a shared session store (Redis or Database).
- Implementation: Write a custom Laravel Session Driver (implementing
Illuminate\Contracts\Session\Session) that reads the legacy session format, or update the legacy app to write Laravel-compatible sessions.
3. Database Coexistence
You cannot simply “change the database” overnight.
- Strategy: Both applications connect to the same database.
- Eloquent Models: Create Laravel Eloquent models that map to your existing legacy tables. You do not need to rename tables immediately.
class User extends Model { protected $table = 'tbl_usr_01'; // Map to legacy table protected $primaryKey = 'id_usr'; } - Refactoring: Rename columns and restructure tables after the code migration is complete, using Laravel Migrations.
Architecture Transformation
graph TD
subgraph "Server"
A[Web Server / Load Balancer] -->|Route: /new-feature| B[Laravel App]
A -->|Route: /legacy-path| C[Legacy PHP App]
B --> D[(Shared Database)]
C --> D
B --> E[(Redis Session Store)]
C --> E
end
style B fill:#ff2d20,stroke:#333,stroke-width:2px,color:white
style C fill:#8892bf,stroke:#333,stroke-width:2px,color:white
How to Choose a PHP to Laravel Migration Partner
If you need to reskill your team: Vehikl. Their “Mob Programming” approach means they code with your team, teaching them TDD and Laravel best practices as they migrate. You end up with a modernized app AND a modernized team.
If you have a complex, high-traffic domain: Spatie. They are the architects of the modern Laravel ecosystem. If your domain logic is knotty and performance is critical, they are the best in the world.
If you need enterprise-grade consulting: Tighten. They specialize in working with large organizations and navigating the organizational challenges of migration, not just the code.
If you are budget-conscious: Belitsoft or 10Clouds. They offer high-quality engineering talent at competitive rates, ideal for labor-intensive refactoring work.
Red flags:
- “We’ll rewrite it in 3 months.” (They won’t. It will take 12, and it will be buggy.)
- “We don’t write tests.” (Migration is refactoring. Refactoring without tests is suicide.)
- “We’ll use an automated converter tool for everything.” (Tools like Laravel Shift are great helpers, but they don’t fix architectural rot. Human insight is required.)
When to Hire PHP Migration Services
1. Security Compliance Failure (SOC2 / ISO 27001)
Your penetration test failed because you’re running PHP 5.6 or 7.0. You cannot upgrade PHP because the legacy framework doesn’t support PHP 8.x. Trigger: “We failed our SOC2 audit due to EOL software.”
2. Feature Paralysis (Velocity Collapse)
Adding a simple feature takes weeks because the code is “spaghetti.” New developers take months to onboard because there is no documentation and “magic” global variables everywhere. Trigger: “It took 3 weeks to change a button color.”
3. Talent Drain
Good developers don’t want to work on CodeIgniter 2 in 2025. They want to work with Laravel, Vue, and React. You are losing your best people to companies with modern stacks. Trigger: “Our lead dev just quit.”
Total Cost of Ownership: Legacy vs. Laravel
| Line Item | Legacy PHP (Annual) | Modern Laravel (Annual) |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | High (Inefficient code, vertical scaling) | Low (Horizontal scaling, Serverless) |
| Maintenance | $150k (Bug fixes take forever) | $50k (Clean code, automated tests) |
| New Features | Slow (High risk of breaking things) | Fast (CI/CD, confident deployment) |
| Security Risk | Critical (Unpatched vulnerabilities) | Low (Auto-updates, secure defaults) |
Break-Even Analysis:
- Migration Cost: $150k (One-time)
- Annual Savings: $100k
- Break-Even: 1.5 Years
Typical Migration Roadmap
Phase 1: Preparation (Weeks 1-4)
- Dockerize the legacy application (ensure consistent environment).
- Add Tests to the most critical paths (Login, Checkout) using Cypress or Playwright.
- Install Laravel and configure the web server (Strangler Fig setup).
Phase 2: The “Walking Skeleton” (Weeks 5-8)
- Implement Shared Authentication (Users can log in to both apps).
- Migrate the Layout/Shell (Header, Footer, Navigation) so users don’t see a visual jar between apps.
Phase 3: Incremental Migration (Months 3-12)
- Pick a module (e.g., “Invoices”).
- Write Feature Tests in Laravel.
- Implement the logic in Laravel (refactoring as you go).
- Switch the route.
- Delete the legacy code for that module.
Phase 4: Cleanup (Month 13)
- Remove the legacy app files.
- Refactor the database schema (rename tables/columns).
- Celebrate!
CodeIgniter to Laravel Migration
CodeIgniter 2/3 applications are strong candidates for incremental Laravel migration because they already use MVC patterns. The practical path is to keep the existing database, run Laravel and CodeIgniter side-by-side, and migrate module-by-module with route-level cutovers. This avoids a full rewrite and lets teams ship features during modernization.
PHP 5 to Laravel Upgrade Cost
For legacy PHP 5.x estates, cost depends on architecture quality and test coverage more than framework choice. In our current benchmark set, projects range from $25K to $1M+, with a $150K median. Smaller migrations typically involve a critical module carve-out; enterprise programs include auth/session unification, database coexistence, and phased domain refactoring.
How Much Does PHP to Laravel Migration Cost?
Most organizations should budget for a staged engagement rather than a single “big bang” estimate. Typical windows are 6-18 months and the strongest outcomes come from incremental migration plans that preserve uptime. The lowest-risk pricing model is phased delivery: discovery and risk burn-down first, then module waves with production validation after each cutover.
FAQ
Why not just rewrite in Node.js or Go?
PHP is alive and well. Laravel is faster to develop in than almost anything else. If your team knows PHP, moving to Laravel leverages their existing skills while giving you modern power. Rewriting in a new language throws away all your domain knowledge and requires a completely new hiring strategy.
Can we use automated tools like Laravel Shift?
Yes! We love Laravel Shift for upgrading existing Laravel apps. For legacy PHP code, we use Rector. Rector is an automated refactoring tool that can instantly upgrade old PHP syntax (e.g., array() to [], adding type hints) to modern standards. However, moving from a custom legacy framework to Laravel requires human architectural decisions that tools can’t make.
What happens to our data?
Your data stays right where it is. We connect Laravel to your existing database. We might add some new tables for Laravel features (like migrations, jobs, sessions), but your core business data remains untouched until we explicitly decide to refactor the schema.
Vendor Interview Questions
- Do you use the Strangler Fig pattern or do you propose a full rewrite?
- How will you handle shared authentication and sessions during the transition?
- What is your strategy for modernizing the database schema without breaking the legacy app?