The Challenge
Oracle Database is the gold standard for enterprise reliability, but its licensing costs are prohibitive, and it lags in the open-source AI ecosystem. Moving to PostgreSQL (specifically with pgvector) is the #1 move for companies building RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) applications.
Technical Deep Dive
1. The PL/SQL Trap
- Challenge: You likely have business logic trapped in thousands of lines of PL/SQL.
- Modernization: Don’t just port it to PL/pgSQL. Move business logic to Python/FastAPI or Go services. Keep the database for data, not logic.
- Nuance: Watch out for
NUMBERvsNUMERICperformance differences. Oracle’sNUMBERis highly optimized; PostgresNUMERICis slower. UseDOUBLE PRECISIONorBIGINTwhere possible.
2. Vector Enablement (The “Why”)
- Goal: Enable semantic search on your enterprise data.
- Implementation: Enable the
pgvectorextension. Create embeddings for your text data (using OpenAI or open-source models) and store them invectorcolumns. - Scale Warning:
pgvectoris excellent for <10M vectors. If you are building a billion-scale RAG system, you will need to shard Postgres or look at specialized vector DBs (Milvus/Weaviate). Oracle’s native Vector Search (23ai) handles this scale better but costs 10x more.
3. Proprietary Features
- RAC: Postgres has high availability (Patroni, Citus), but it doesn’t have “Real Application Clusters” (shared disk). You need to architect for shared-nothing.
- Compatibility: Tools like
ora2pgare good, but they often fail on complexCONNECT BYqueries and proprietary joins ((+)). Expect manual refactoring.
How to Choose an Oracle to PostgreSQL Migration Partner
If you need Oracle compatibility: EDB (EnterpriseDB). Their Postgres distribution includes an Oracle compatibility layer, allowing you to run PL/SQL with minimal changes.
If you’re moving to AWS: AWS Professional Services. They have deep expertise with Aurora PostgreSQL and can leverage AWS DMS (Database Migration Service) for near-zero downtime migrations.
If you need AI/GenAI enablement: EPAM Systems. They specialize in building RAG pipelines with pgvector and integrating with Bedrock/OpenAI.
If you have a massive fleet: Accenture. They can handle 100+ database migrations in parallel with industrial-scale tooling.
Red flags:
- Vendors who claim “100% automated migration” without mentioning manual PL/SQL refactoring
- No experience with pgvector or vector indexing strategies
- Ignoring performance tuning differences between Oracle and Postgres
- No plan for handling Oracle-specific features (RAC, Partitioning, Advanced Compression)
When to Hire Oracle to PostgreSQL Migration Services
1. The Oracle Tax
Your Oracle licensing renewal just came in. The cost has increased 25%, and your CFO is demanding an alternative.
Trigger: Annual Oracle license bill >$500K.
2. GenAI/RAG Requirements
Your company is building AI-powered search using vector embeddings. Oracle’s vector search capabilities exist (23ai) but are prohibitively expensive compared to pgvector.
Trigger: “We need semantic search on 10M documents.”
3. Cloud Migration
You’re moving to AWS/Azure/GCP. Running Oracle on RDS is expensive and doesn’t leverage cloud-native features like Aurora’s auto-scaling.
Trigger: Cloud-first mandate from leadership.
4. Open Source Strategy
Your CTO has declared “No more vendor lock-in.” PostgreSQL aligns with the company’s open-source philosophy.
Trigger: Strategic shift to open-source ecosystem.
5. Talent Availability
You can’t find or afford Oracle DBAs. PostgreSQL has a much larger talent pool at lower salaries.
Trigger: Key DBA retirement; inability to hire replacement.
Total Cost of Ownership: Oracle vs PostgreSQL
| Line Item | % of Total Budget | Example ($500K Project) |
|---|---|---|
| Schema Conversion | 20-30% | $100K-$150K |
| PL/SQL → PL/pgSQL Migration | 30-40% | $150K-$200K |
| Data Migration & Validation | 20-25% | $100K-$125K |
| Performance Tuning | 15-20% | $75K-$100K |
Hidden Costs NOT Included:
- Downtime: Oracle allows online migration with GoldenGate; Postgres requires more planning.
- Training: DBAs need to unlearn Oracle-specific patterns and learn Postgres internals.
- Third-Party Tools: Replacing Oracle Enterprise Manager with pgAdmin/DataGrip.
Break-Even Analysis:
- Median Investment: $350K
- Annual Oracle Savings: $600K (Licensing + Support)
- Break-Even: 7 months
Oracle to PostgreSQL Migration Roadmap
Phase 1: Assessment & Schema Conversion (Months 1-2)
Activities:
- Run ora2pg or AWS SCT to analyze schema complexity
- Identify Oracle-specific features (Partitioning, Materialized Views)
- Convert DDL to PostgreSQL syntax
Deliverables:
- Converted Schema (PostgreSQL DDL)
- Gap Analysis Report
Phase 2: PL/SQL Migration (Months 3-4)
Activities:
- Convert stored procedures to PL/pgSQL
- Refactor complex logic to application layer (Python/Go)
- Handle Oracle packages (DBMS_SCHEDULER → pg_cron)
Deliverables:
- Converted Stored Procedures
- Unit Tests for Critical Functions
Phase 3: Data Migration & Sync (Months 5-6)
Activities:
- Use AWS DMS or Ora2Pg for data migration
- Set up CDC (Change Data Capture) for real-time sync
- Validate data integrity (row counts, hash checks)
Deliverables:
- Migrated Data
- Real-Time Sync Active
Phase 4: Testing & Cutover (Months 7-9)
Activities:
- Performance testing (compare query plans)
- Parallel run (Oracle vs Postgres)
- Final cutover and decommission Oracle
Deliverables:
- Production PostgreSQL Database
- Decommissioned Oracle Instances
Architecture Transformation
graph TD
subgraph "Legacy Oracle"
A[Oracle Forms/Apps] --> B[PL/SQL Logic]
B --> C["(Oracle DB)"]
D[Oracle Scheduler] --> B
end
subgraph "Modern PostgreSQL"
E[Java/Node.js App] --> F[PostgreSQL Function]
F --> G["(PostgreSQL + pgvector)"]
H[pg_cron] --> F
I[GenAI/RAG] --> G
end
style B fill:#f9f,stroke:#333,stroke-width:2px
style F fill:#bbf,stroke:#333,stroke-width:2px
Post-Migration: Best Practices
Months 1-3: Optimization
- Query Tuning: Analyze slow queries with EXPLAIN ANALYZE. Add missing indexes.
- Vacuum Settings: Configure auto-vacuum aggressively for high-write tables.
Months 4-6: Modernization
- pgvector: Enable vector search for AI/RAG use cases.
- Extensions: Explore PostGIS (geospatial), pg_partman (partitioning), TimescaleDB (time-series).
Expanded FAQs
Can we keep using Oracle features like Partitioning?
Answer: PostgreSQL supports partitioning (declarative partitioning since v10). However, Oracle’s advanced partitioning strategies (Interval, Reference) require manual redesign in Postgres.
What about Real Application Clusters (RAC)?
Answer: Postgres doesn’t have RAC. For HA, use Patroni (auto-failover), Citus (sharding), or Aurora PostgreSQL (AWS-managed HA). Shared-nothing architecture is the modern way.
How do we handle NUMBER(38,0) in Postgres?
Answer: Oracle’s NUMBER is flexible but slow. In Postgres, use BIGINT for integers, NUMERIC(38,0) for exact precision, or DOUBLE PRECISION for performance (but beware of rounding).
What replaces Oracle Enterprise Manager (OEM)?
Answer: For monitoring, use pgAdmin, DataGrip, or cloud-native tools (AWS RDS Performance Insights, Azure Database Insights). For enterprise needs, consider Percona Monitoring.
Is pgvector production-ready?
Answer: Yes, for <10M vectors. Beyond that, consider specialized vector DBs (Pinecone, Milvus, Weaviate) or shard Postgres. pgvector is excellent for RAG use cases but not for billion-scale semantic search.
What about migrating from NoSQL databases to PostgreSQL?
Answer: If you’re migrating from NoSQL databases like MongoDB to PostgreSQL, the challenges are different. MongoDB to PostgreSQL requires schema normalization (converting nested documents to relational tables), while Oracle to PostgreSQL is more about PL/SQL conversion and feature mapping. See our MongoDB to PostgreSQL Migration Services guide for details on handling document-to-relational transformations.
What about caching layer migrations (Redis to Valkey)?
Answer: If you’re looking to optimize your caching infrastructure alongside database migrations, consider Redis to Valkey migration. Valkey is an open-source fork of Redis (BSD license) that offers 20-60% cost savings and performance improvements. This is particularly relevant if you’re escaping vendor lock-in (like Oracle→PostgreSQL) and want to ensure your entire stack is open source.