Top Rated Delphi to C# Migration Services

The Delphi Dilemma

Delphi (Object Pascal) is loved by its developers for a reason: it compiles to fast, native code and has a brilliant IDE. But finding new Delphi developers is becoming impossible.

Technical Deep Dive

1. Pointers vs. Managed Code

Delphi uses pointers extensively (^Integer, GetMem). C# uses a Garbage Collector.

• Migration Risk: Direct translation leads to unsafe C# code blocks, which defeats the purpose of migrating.
• Solution: Refactor pointer logic to use standard .NET Collections (List<T>, Dictionary<T,K>) and Span<T> for high-performance memory access.

2. The VCL Trap

The Visual Component Library (VCL) is tightly coupled to the Windows API.

• Don’t: Try to wrap VCL components in .NET wrappers.
• Do: Rewrite the UI in WPF (for desktop) or Blazor (for web). Use the MVVM pattern to decouple the new UI from the migrated business logic.

3. Database Access: BDE to EF Core

Many legacy Delphi apps use the Borland Database Engine (BDE).

• Status: BDE is deprecated and unstable on modern Windows.
• Path: Move to FireDAC (if staying in Delphi) or Entity Framework Core (if moving to C#). This is a great opportunity to switch from Paradox/Interbase to SQL Server or PostgreSQL.

The failure pattern:

1. Vendor promises 80% automation
2. Automated tool generates 100,000 lines of “C# that looks like Delphi”
3. No one can maintain it
4. Project restarts from scratch at Month 18

The Right Approach

Don’t automate the migration. Rebuild from specs.

1. Reverse-engineer the business logic by interviewing power users
2. Write specifications for each module
3. Build C# app from scratch using modern architecture (MVVM, dependency injection)
4. Run parallel systems for 6-12 months

This takes longer but produces maintainable code.

Vendor Red Flags

❌ “We have Delphi-to-C# conversion software” — This produces garbage.
❌ “We keep the same UI/UX” — Impossible. VCL doesn’t map to WPF.
✅ “We treat this as a greenfield rewrite” — This is the only honest answer.

How to Choose a Delphi Migration Partner

If you want to stay on Delphi but modernize: Embarcadero. The creators of Delphi offer consulting to help you upgrade to the latest version (12 Athens) and refactor for mobile/cloud.

If you need a complete exit to C#: N-iX or SoftServe. They specialize in manual re-engineering and have deep .NET expertise to rebuild your app correctly.

If you have a massive government/defense system: TSRI. Their automated transformation engine is one of the few that can handle millions of lines of Pascal with high accuracy.

If you need a large-scale rewrite: EPAM Systems. They bring software engineering excellence and can scale teams quickly for global rollouts.

Red flags:

• Vendors who claim 100% automated migration for UI code (VCL to WPF/Blazor)
• No plan for handling “Unsafe” pointer code
• Suggesting a “Lift and Shift” of the database without removing BDE dependencies first

When to Hire Delphi to C# Migration Services

1. The 32-bit Ceiling

Your application is hitting the 2GB memory limit of 32-bit processes. You need 64-bit address space for large datasets, but your 3rd party components don’t support 64-bit.

Trigger: OutOfMemory exceptions; inability to process large files.

2. Talent Vacuum

You posted a job for a “Senior Delphi Developer” and got zero qualified applicants in 6 months.

Trigger: Key developer retirement; inability to scale the team.

3. Web & Mobile Demands

Sales teams want an iPad app. Customers want a web portal. Delphi’s “FireMonkey” framework can do this, but C# (Blazor/MAUI) does it better and with a larger ecosystem.

Trigger: Lost deals because “we don’t have a web version.”

4. Integration Nightmares

Connecting your Delphi app to modern REST APIs, OAuth2, or Cloud services requires expensive 3rd party libraries and custom hacks.

Trigger: “It takes 2 weeks to integrate a simple API.”

5. Security Compliance

Your legacy BDE (Borland Database Engine) is no longer supported and flagged by security audits.

Trigger: Failed penetration test; unpatched vulnerabilities.

Total Cost of Ownership: Delphi vs C#

Hidden Costs NOT Included:

• Spec Writing: You likely have no documentation. Reverse-engineering specs from code takes time.
• User Training: The new UI will look different. Users hate change.
• Lost Productivity: During the “Parallel Run” phase, users do double entry.

Break-Even Analysis:

• Median Investment: $800K
• Annual Savings: $250K (Licensing + Efficiency + Cheaper Talent)
• Break-Even: 3-3.5 years

Delphi to C# Migration Roadmap

Phase 1: Discovery & Specification (Months 1-3)

Activities:

• Interview power users to understand workflows
• Analyze source code to map dependencies
• Identify all 3rd party components (Grid, Reports, Charts)
• Write functional specifications for the new system

Deliverables:

• Functional Spec Document
• UI Wireframes (Figma)
• Architecture Blueprint

Phase 2: Database Modernization (Months 4-5)

Activities:

• Replace Paradox/Interbase with SQL Server or PostgreSQL
• Remove BDE (Borland Database Engine) dependencies
• Migrate data and validate integrity

Risks:

• Data type mismatches (Paradox blobs vs SQL varbinary)

Deliverables:

• Modern SQL Database
• Data Migration Scripts

Phase 3: Core Logic Rewrite (Months 6-12)

Activities:

• Rebuild business logic in C# (.NET Core)
• Implement Unit Tests (NUnit/xUnit)
• Expose logic as RESTful APIs (if web) or Services (if desktop)

Deliverables:

• Backend API / Service Layer
• Swagger Documentation

Phase 4: UI Construction (Months 13-18)

Activities:

• Build new Frontend (Blazor for Web, WPF/MAUI for Desktop)
• Bind UI to Backend Services
• Recreate Reports (Crystal/FastReport → SSRS/PowerBI)

Deliverables:

• Functional Application
• User Manuals

Architecture Transformation

graph TD
    subgraph "Legacy Delphi"
        A["VCL Forms (UI)"] --> B["Business Logic (Pas)"]
        B --> C[BDE / ADO]
        C --> D["(Paradox / Interbase)"]
    end

    subgraph "Modern C# .NET"
        E["WPF / WinForms / Blazor"] --> F["Business Logic (C#)"]
        F --> G["Entity Framework Core"]
        G --> H["(SQL Server / Azure SQL)"]
    end
    I[PowerBI Reports] --> H

    style A fill:#f9f,stroke:#333,stroke-width:2px
    style E fill:#bbf,stroke:#333,stroke-width:2px

Post-Migration: Best Practices

Months 1-3: Adoption

• Training: Run “Train the Trainer” sessions.
• Feedback Loop: Create a dedicated channel for “Missing Features” (things the old app did that the new one doesn’t).

Months 4-6: Optimization

• Performance: Tune Entity Framework queries. EF Core can be slower than raw SQL if not optimized.
• Cleanup: Decommission the old Delphi app and archive the source code.

Expanded FAQs

Can we use “Delphi2CS” tools?

Answer: Tools like Delphi2CS can give you a head start on syntax conversion (Pascal to C#), but they cannot handle the VCL-to-WinForms mapping or the pointer arithmetic correctly. Treat the output as “pseudo-code” to read, not code to compile.

What about our reports (FastReport / QuickReport)?

Answer: These are proprietary binary formats. They cannot be converted automatically. You will need to rebuild them in SSRS, PowerBI, or a modern .NET reporting tool. This is often 20% of the project effort.

Should we go Desktop (WPF) or Web (Blazor)?

Answer: Web (Blazor) is the future. It solves deployment headaches (no more installers). However, if your app interacts heavily with local hardware (scanners, scales, serial ports), WPF or MAUI might be a better fit.

How do we handle “Unsafe” code?

Answer: Delphi allows direct memory access. C# generally doesn’t (unless you use the unsafe keyword). We rewrite these sections using safe, managed .NET patterns. If performance is critical, we use Span<T> and Memory<T>.

Why is the failure rate so high?

Answer: Scope creep. Stakeholders say “Since we are rewriting it, let’s add X, Y, and Z features.” This turns a migration project into a massive new product development project, which collapses under its own weight. Stick to parity first.