PLATFORM TEAM CHARTER Version, approver, and review date: [fill in] Purpose and users - Recurring delivery problem: [observed task and current friction] - Initial users and pilot application team: [names] - Supported capability and interface: [scope] - Out of scope: [product logic, unsupported runtimes, other exclusions] Structure and authority - Topology: [centralized / federated with shared core] - Engineering sponsor and reporting line: [name / role] - Core funding and priority decision-maker: [name / role] - Product discovery and backlog owner: [name / role] - Domain extensions, owners, and funding, if any: [list] - Authority for compatibility and scope disputes: [name / role] Ownership and operation - Deployment platform owner and operator: [names; distinguish them] - Backing-service operators and contact routes: [list] - Product-service owners and application on-call: [list] - Security policy owner and control implementers: [names] - Security exception reviewer and risk acceptor: [names] - SRE-supported services and acceptance boundaries: [list or none] Team interactions - Pilot work and completion criteria: [task / evidence] - Self-service interfaces and documentation: [locations] - Routine support channel and support hours: [details] - Feedback and roadmap review: [cadence / participants] - Exception request and domain-extension process: [details] Reliability and escalation - Platform service objectives and monitoring owner: [details] - Initial alert recipient and response commitment: [details] - Incident declaration authority and coordination lead: [names / roles] - Core, extension, application, and backing-service escalation: [routes] - Security incident escalation: [route] - Handoff rule: [named recipient accepts before coordination transfers] - Recovery procedure and incident follow-up owners: [locations / names] Pilot evidence and review - Baseline task, workload, and observation period: [details] - Success criteria: [self-service completion, manual steps, reliability] - Developer feedback and unresolved friction: [method] - Capacity for maintenance, support, and improvement: [assumptions] - Decision date: [expand / revise / stop] - Structure review triggers: [persistent domain needs, duplication, incompatible interfaces, unclear ownership, unsustainable support]